Comments on: Supermodel Naomi Campbell Subpoenaed, Prosecutors To Reopen Case

By: noko5

noko5 — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:15:13 +0000

Morris kanneh,
I think your comment about Issa being illiterate is kinda disgusting. The guy is talking about somethig that he fully participated. What does literacy got to do with this? This an education that he has and good informations that we all need to know because of either our collective or individual interest. I strongly think your perception of literacy is being misguided. We do not need any bookman to tell us what took place in BUTUO, GBORPLAY, BO WATERSIDE or KONO district in Sierraleone. I also want to charlenge that you do not know this Issa Sesay guy, from anywhere beside seeing him on this web through its it data/graphics connectivities. How could you deductively conclude that he’s not literate…… Come on people.. BOOK BOOK BOOK.. PLEASE.

By: Ms. Teage

Ms. Teage — Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:23:51 +0000

Aki,
I’m jealous wish I was in Liberia right now. How is Kendejah I tried to go but never made it. I visited the ‘Palm Springs’ a couple of times, but never Kendejah….but defintely in December.
-Cheers.

By: cen

cen — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 20:22:10 +0000

@ kanneh
where does it say president taylor is “godfather” to…? Or are you just making a funny?

By: cen

cen — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 20:16:16 +0000

@ kanneh
thanks for the link. very interesting…it also links to becauseiamagirl.org. for those who are interested in helping…you can do plenty to help educate the children who suffered in SL and other countries. Children are the single largest disadvantaged group in the world. We must educate, nurture and love all children.

By: noko5

noko5 — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:24:05 +0000

Happy belated 4th Ms. Teage…

By: sam

sam — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 07:43:26 +0000

Morris Kanneh,
Good Hypothesis! But where does hypothesis end? – Far away from reality. Reality though is that Charles Taylor did not support nor aid the RUF in its campaign in SL and that is exactly what Issa Sesay is saying to the court.

By: J. fallah menjor

J. fallah menjor — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 00:13:04 +0000

Mr. Big B, I respectfully disagree with your inductive reasoning. Naomi did not say, emphatically, that she did not receive diamond from taylor. What Naomi said was that taylor never gave her diamond. Naomi received the diamond from men who came to her hotel room and handed it to her instead.To you, therefore, Naomi did not receive diamond from taylor! This is called” inductive reasoning” Big B.
Why not refrain from this tiype of thinking and reasoning, Mr. B? Do this for your own intellectual growth, at least! Same goes to others who believe this man will get out based upon technicalities! Sorry!

By: Aki

Aki — Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:34:08 +0000

Morris Kanneh,
All I can say is “Wow” to your post above

By: Ken

Ken — Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:00:48 +0000

The reason that an eight years old girl is treated as a bribe is not because of Sesay it is an African tradition that need to be STOP

By: Noko4

Noko4 — Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:57:07 +0000

Morrris,
The fact that he is testifying on behalf of Mr. Taylor that is alone is telling. He has NOTHING to gain in case you are wondering.