Comments on: The Admission of Hearsay Evidence in the Taylor Trial http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/03/12/the-admission-of-hearsay-evidence-in-the-taylor-trial/ International Criminal Justice in the Making Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:34:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Noko4 http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/03/12/the-admission-of-hearsay-evidence-in-the-taylor-trial/#comment-28676 Noko4 Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:51:37 +0000 http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4851#comment-28676 Ha ha ha .....so we now see from what I said WAY BACK when Mr. Griffith objected to the very FIRST HEARSAY and was overruled....it was never a part of any trial before this trial. I believe the RULES were amended to FIT the mode. Again, I will say for such a case, FACTUAL FACTS should be the ONLY evidences allow...PERIOD!!!! Ha ha ha …..so we now see from what I said WAY BACK when Mr. Griffith objected to the very FIRST HEARSAY and was overruled….it was never a part of any trial before this trial. I believe the RULES were amended to FIT the mode.

Again, I will say for such a case, FACTUAL FACTS should be the ONLY evidences allow…PERIOD!!!!

]]> By: Tracey Gurd http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/03/12/the-admission-of-hearsay-evidence-in-the-taylor-trial/#comment-28008 Tracey Gurd Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:29:27 +0000 http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4851#comment-28008 Thank you Lee. That is a really nice note of yours and I appreciate your thoughtfulness in taking the time to send it. Best, Tracey Thank you Lee. That is a really nice note of yours and I appreciate your thoughtfulness in taking the time to send it.
Best,
Tracey

]]> By: Jose Rodriguez http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/03/12/the-admission-of-hearsay-evidence-in-the-taylor-trial/#comment-27957 Jose Rodriguez Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:59:30 +0000 http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4851#comment-27957 Tracey Gurd, You are most welcomed when you said, "sorry to burst your analysis on this one". These are the kinds of analytical discussions that I expect the side that always claimed to be more educated, intelligent, and good people to advance and that's just exactly what you have done. However, let me thank you personally for your salient points that you have raised as the result of you sibliminally raising my intellectual spontaneity. Nontheless, you have just stimulated and motivated me even more to go into my analytical mood. Tracey, Yes, it is true that the defense is presenting their case at this junction. However, it is "NOT" mandatory or banding on the judges to accept or mark evidence for identification from the defense. The judges however, reserve the rights to reject evidence put forward when deem fit. More importantly, the prosecution has no statute of limitation preventing them from objecting to documents put forward by the defense. In fact, there were objections made by the prosecutor and it was overruled by the judges' decision. So Tracey Gurd, I am right for saying what I said to Fallah and also right on the judges' decision in accepting more evidence from the defense than that of their counterpart. Bear in mind now Tracey, there were also evidences marked for identification for the prosecution. But those of the defense swamped the prosecution. Tracey Gurd,

You are most welcomed when you said, “sorry to burst your analysis on this one”. These are the kinds of analytical discussions that I expect the side that always claimed to be more educated, intelligent, and good people to advance and that’s just exactly what you have done. However, let me thank you personally for your salient points that you have raised as the result of you sibliminally raising my intellectual spontaneity. Nontheless, you have just stimulated and motivated me even more to go into my analytical mood. Tracey, Yes, it is true that the defense is presenting their case at this junction. However, it is “NOT” mandatory or banding on the judges to accept or mark evidence for identification from the defense. The judges however, reserve the rights to reject evidence put forward when deem fit. More importantly, the prosecution has no statute of limitation preventing them from objecting to documents put forward by the defense. In fact, there were objections made by the prosecutor and it was overruled by the judges’ decision.

So Tracey Gurd, I am right for saying what I said to Fallah and also right on the judges’ decision in accepting more evidence from the defense than that of their counterpart. Bear in mind now Tracey, there were also evidences marked for identification for the prosecution. But those of the defense swamped the prosecution.

]]> By: Lee http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/03/12/the-admission-of-hearsay-evidence-in-the-taylor-trial/#comment-27927 Lee Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:48:59 +0000 http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4851#comment-27927 Hi Tracy thanks for your hard works and continous efforts in informing us that are unable to take time and do what u doin. i appreciate it a lot. Hi Tracy thanks for your hard works and continous efforts in informing us that are unable to take time and do what u doin. i appreciate it a lot.

]]> By: Tracey Gurd http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/03/12/the-admission-of-hearsay-evidence-in-the-taylor-trial/#comment-27775 Tracey Gurd Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:01:06 +0000 http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4851#comment-27775 Hi Harris -- alas I cannot publish a comment of yours of today at 3:16pm unless you are able to reframe the last two sentences to focus on the issues arising out of the trial and away from other readers. Would you mind resubmitting and I'll be happy to post it. Best, Tracey Hi Harris — alas I cannot publish a comment of yours of today at 3:16pm unless you are able to reframe the last two sentences to focus on the issues arising out of the trial and away from other readers. Would you mind resubmitting and I’ll be happy to post it.
Best,
Tracey

]]> By: Tracey Gurd http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/03/12/the-admission-of-hearsay-evidence-in-the-taylor-trial/#comment-27770 Tracey Gurd Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:55:38 +0000 http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4851#comment-27770 Hi Jose -- I am sorry to burst your analysis on this one. But if I am remembering correctly, that list of documents you mention contained many more defense documents because it is now the defense team's turn to present evidence and to mark documents for identification as they present their case. The prosecution did the same thing when it was presenting its case. I think we need to look at it more as a procedural issue as a function of the case rather than any win or blow for one side or the other. Best, Tracey Hi Jose — I am sorry to burst your analysis on this one. But if I am remembering correctly, that list of documents you mention contained many more defense documents because it is now the defense team’s turn to present evidence and to mark documents for identification as they present their case. The prosecution did the same thing when it was presenting its case. I think we need to look at it more as a procedural issue as a function of the case rather than any win or blow for one side or the other.
Best,
Tracey

]]> By: Harris K Johnson http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/03/12/the-admission-of-hearsay-evidence-in-the-taylor-trial/#comment-27723 Harris K Johnson Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:17:06 +0000 http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4851#comment-27723 Ms. Teage, Please I'm not desperate about Mr. Taylor innocence, but rather I'm desperate for his total freedon. My greatest gain will be that a leader is once again allowed to lead his people and a loving father reunited with his many children. My dear Teage, the fact remains that he did not do those things that you and your so-called white master have accused him of. By the way are you second Fallah? Harris K Johnson Ms. Teage,
Please I’m not desperate about Mr. Taylor innocence, but rather I’m desperate for his total freedon. My greatest gain will be that a leader is once again allowed to lead his people and a loving father reunited with his many children. My dear Teage, the fact remains that he did not do those things that you and your so-called white master have accused him of. By the way are you second Fallah?

Harris K Johnson

]]> By: Jose Rodriguez http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/03/12/the-admission-of-hearsay-evidence-in-the-taylor-trial/#comment-27639 Jose Rodriguez Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:37:09 +0000 http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4851#comment-27639 Fallah, You keep on talking about immense or mountain of eveidence, but you can't show one. What immense evidence are you talking about against this innocen man? I remember however, in one of my posts, I produced all the evidences that were either marked for identification for both the defense and prosecution or accepted as evidence. Man oh man, not even close. The judges took almost all of the defense evidence and took a little tiny bit of the prosecution. Do you remember that? I guess not. Anyways, the defense had more evidence accepted than the prosecution. Fallah,

You keep on talking about immense or mountain of eveidence, but you can’t show one. What immense evidence are you talking about against this innocen man? I remember however, in one of my posts, I produced all the evidences that were either marked for identification for both the defense and prosecution or accepted as evidence. Man oh man, not even close. The judges took almost all of the defense evidence and took a little tiny bit of the prosecution. Do you remember that? I guess not. Anyways, the defense had more evidence accepted than the prosecution.

]]> By: Jose Rodriguez http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/03/12/the-admission-of-hearsay-evidence-in-the-taylor-trial/#comment-27637 Jose Rodriguez Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:27:12 +0000 http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4851#comment-27637 Fallah, We are also speaking on behalf of those who never had the chance to speak. Fallah,

We are also speaking on behalf of those who never had the chance to speak.

]]> By: Tracey Gurd http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/03/12/the-admission-of-hearsay-evidence-in-the-taylor-trial/#comment-27605 Tracey Gurd Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:53:40 +0000 http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4851#comment-27605 Dear J Fallah Menjor -- may I ask you for your help: can you please help us here to keep everyone's temperatures cool as we discuss the trial? You raise important points, but we need to keep focussed on the trial and not each other. Best, Tracey Dear J Fallah Menjor — may I ask you for your help: can you please help us here to keep everyone’s temperatures cool as we discuss the trial? You raise important points, but we need to keep focussed on the trial and not each other.

Best,
Tracey

]]>