Comments on: Foreign Countries Prevented Charles Taylor From Liberating Liberia, Witness Says

By: Impunity Watch » Blog Archive » Charles Taylor Trial Update

Impunity Watch » Blog Archive » Charles Taylor Trial Update — Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:56:29 +0000

[...] Taylor Trial – Foreign Countries Prevented Charles Taylor From Liberating Liberia – 11 March [...]

By: Tracey Gurd

Tracey Gurd — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:04:52 +0000

Yes, $$ker is missed here! I hope he returns back to our conversation soon.
Best,
tracey

By: noko5

noko5 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:02:04 +0000

Ken,
I think MS. Teage had a shot of champaing and just decided to mess with us since we are winning. But thats ok, we accept that too…

By: noko5

noko5 — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:03:33 +0000

Look $$Bnker,
Try and post something. Have you retired….

By: Ken

Ken — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:37:10 +0000

Ms. Teage,
So what you are claiming now, that in fact you do not know if Liberia is in the Guinness book of world record for being the richest country in sub-Sahara Africa in 78. Ms. Teage so what you admit to is passing on someone else lie or misinformation.

By: Ms. Teage

Ms. Teage — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:26:49 +0000

Andrew
I’m not sure what gave the impression that I was changing my mind about what I previously said about Liberia. I’m not ignorant nor a fool to make up such a lie and then come on a website with majority of Liberians and post it. I stand by what I said 100%. Everything I’ve learned about Liberia I learned it through reading and research. I read in an journal article that Liberias GDP was close n and that we were in the guiness book of world record for being the richest country in sub-sahara Africa in 78; it is something I have always remembered because I was really impressed by that because I figure in 78 Liberia was way smaller Japan, and still is, so if we had a GDP close to Japan our ecomimic state was pretty darn good!!
I didn’t decide in my head to make it up. but as I stated if you disagree, and you intelliently ask where did you get your facts I will surely let you know and if you belive the article is debatable or absolutely factual then we can have a conversation. Versus ‘youre speaking lies or you’re a liar’.
But like I said before I stand by what I said. If I find the article since its been six years since I wrote my freshman research paper on Liberia I will be glad to post the article and then we can continue from there…until than……

By: Jose Rodriguez

Jose Rodriguez — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:17:53 +0000

John Thompson,

Do you want to send me to the Hague because of security reason?

By: Jose Rodriguez

Jose Rodriguez — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:59:08 +0000

Morris Kanneh,

Are you sure you are referring to the defense of being desperate? Please list your desperation of the defense Morris.

By: Jose Rodriguez

Jose Rodriguez — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:56:27 +0000

Noko7/Davenport,

Just keep on asking your many questions. One day you will find answer. Probably judgment day.

By: Helen

Helen — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:54:36 +0000

Davenport,

My response was specifically to the allusion made earlier that the act of a revolutionary was a terroristic one. I endeavoured to draw attention to the fact that what is at one time called a terroristic act is at another time termed liberation by another. It is clearly seen when the powerful wants to put controls on the less powerful that they tend to term their act of liberation as being a terroristic one.

I used the very definition that was used earlier by Fallah menjor as taken from the dictionary he used. I did a very brief analysis of the definition and pointed out that there should be some caution used in attaching the term to describe every act within that context. We have to be aware that the when it is perpetrated by the powerful it is totally approbated. However when it is perpetrated by the weak it is vitiated.

I am not goin into the onomatopoeia of the word terrorist but the persception attached to it. i therefore fail to see your point.