<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slight Delays In Publishing Comments For The Coming Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/02/26/slight-delays-in-publishing-comments-for-the-coming-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/02/26/slight-delays-in-publishing-comments-for-the-coming-week/</link>
	<description>International Criminal Justice in the Making</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:28:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracey Gurd</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/02/26/slight-delays-in-publishing-comments-for-the-coming-week/#comment-25487</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracey Gurd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4786#comment-25487</guid>
		<description>Thank you Noko4!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Noko4!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noko4</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/02/26/slight-delays-in-publishing-comments-for-the-coming-week/#comment-25346</link>
		<dc:creator>Noko4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4786#comment-25346</guid>
		<description>Tracey,
You got my permission....ha ha ha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tracey,<br />
You got my permission&#8230;.ha ha ha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracey Gurd</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/02/26/slight-delays-in-publishing-comments-for-the-coming-week/#comment-25302</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracey Gurd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4786#comment-25302</guid>
		<description>Oh Helen  -- you are so good to remind me and you have been so patient.  I have not forgotten -- I just have been running out of time to do my research on the issues that keep popping up.  Thanks for your patience -- maybe once I get back home from The Hague I can try to put some more time aside to write something about this.  I have got all the research done -- I just need to pull it together and write it up for us.  Thanks for the reminder. 
Best,
Tracey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Helen  &#8212; you are so good to remind me and you have been so patient.  I have not forgotten &#8212; I just have been running out of time to do my research on the issues that keep popping up.  Thanks for your patience &#8212; maybe once I get back home from The Hague I can try to put some more time aside to write something about this.  I have got all the research done &#8212; I just need to pull it together and write it up for us.  Thanks for the reminder.<br />
Best,<br />
Tracey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracey Gurd</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/02/26/slight-delays-in-publishing-comments-for-the-coming-week/#comment-25301</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracey Gurd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4786#comment-25301</guid>
		<description>Hi Jose -- no, you are absolutely right -- I just looked at the wrong screen name when responding.  Glad you picked it up!  It is a good phrase, in any case. 
Best,
Tracey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jose &#8212; no, you are absolutely right &#8212; I just looked at the wrong screen name when responding.  Glad you picked it up!  It is a good phrase, in any case.<br />
Best,<br />
Tracey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracey Gurd</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/02/26/slight-delays-in-publishing-comments-for-the-coming-week/#comment-25297</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracey Gurd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4786#comment-25297</guid>
		<description>Oh Noko4 -- of course! Silly me. I looked at the wrong screen name when responding - I am sorry.  In that case, do you mind if I use the phrase &quot;a disgraceful disgrace&quot; sometime?! I like it. 
Best,
Tracey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Noko4 &#8212; of course! Silly me. I looked at the wrong screen name when responding &#8211; I am sorry.  In that case, do you mind if I use the phrase &#8220;a disgraceful disgrace&#8221; sometime?! I like it.<br />
Best,<br />
Tracey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/02/26/slight-delays-in-publishing-comments-for-the-coming-week/#comment-25217</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 03:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4786#comment-25217</guid>
		<description>Tracey,
 I like your take on the issue of fair trial and the fact that &quot;if there is a case to answer for anyone who is suspected of breaking the law (in this case, international law) then they should have a day in court and have the opportunity to answer the charges against them in the context of a fair trial — and a fair trial includes the ability to put forward their case and bring witnesses in their defense, and the presumption of innocence unless proven guilty.&quot; However how can the same UN and international community put individuals on Travel Bans and Asset Freeze when they have not had an opportunity to have their day in court? Where is justice in this?

Do you know that up to now many individuals are still on these ban lists only because they have ongoing ties to Mr Taylor? Is this a crime, and should they be punished in this way without given their day in court? 

You had promised to do some write up on this issue but have probably forgotten. Could you examine the legalities of this in the context of international justice? Does the UN have the right to abuse the civil and basic human rights of individuals without fair trial?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tracey,<br />
 I like your take on the issue of fair trial and the fact that &#8220;if there is a case to answer for anyone who is suspected of breaking the law (in this case, international law) then they should have a day in court and have the opportunity to answer the charges against them in the context of a fair trial — and a fair trial includes the ability to put forward their case and bring witnesses in their defense, and the presumption of innocence unless proven guilty.&#8221; However how can the same UN and international community put individuals on Travel Bans and Asset Freeze when they have not had an opportunity to have their day in court? Where is justice in this?</p>
<p>Do you know that up to now many individuals are still on these ban lists only because they have ongoing ties to Mr Taylor? Is this a crime, and should they be punished in this way without given their day in court? </p>
<p>You had promised to do some write up on this issue but have probably forgotten. Could you examine the legalities of this in the context of international justice? Does the UN have the right to abuse the civil and basic human rights of individuals without fair trial?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/02/26/slight-delays-in-publishing-comments-for-the-coming-week/#comment-25198</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4786#comment-25198</guid>
		<description>Tracey,

The phrase &quot;a disgraceful disgrace&quot; came from Noko4.However, I am not sure if it was Aki who used it: except you are speaking of something that I made not know of within the context of the phrase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tracey,</p>
<p>The phrase &#8220;a disgraceful disgrace&#8221; came from Noko4.However, I am not sure if it was Aki who used it: except you are speaking of something that I made not know of within the context of the phrase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/02/26/slight-delays-in-publishing-comments-for-the-coming-week/#comment-25196</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4786#comment-25196</guid>
		<description>Noko7,

OUTSTANDING. YOU ARE PHENOMENALLY AWESOME IN THIS IDENTICAL POST. GOOD JOB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noko7,</p>
<p>OUTSTANDING. YOU ARE PHENOMENALLY AWESOME IN THIS IDENTICAL POST. GOOD JOB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/02/26/slight-delays-in-publishing-comments-for-the-coming-week/#comment-25194</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4786#comment-25194</guid>
		<description>Noko7,

Which case that you know of that the prosecution and or defense lawyers are fully aware of their client being the culprit or doer and yet still defend and or prosecute that culprit? Besides, which law code that says it is ok even though you know they committed the crimes to defend or prosecute them to the teeth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noko7,</p>
<p>Which case that you know of that the prosecution and or defense lawyers are fully aware of their client being the culprit or doer and yet still defend and or prosecute that culprit? Besides, which law code that says it is ok even though you know they committed the crimes to defend or prosecute them to the teeth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davenport.noko7</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2010/02/26/slight-delays-in-publishing-comments-for-the-coming-week/#comment-25185</link>
		<dc:creator>Davenport.noko7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4786#comment-25185</guid>
		<description>Aki,

This is all about professional services...and we can nail these fellows all we want but they have the right to defend whosoever they chose. Of course we can question their moral-ethical standards but in this business, things work differently.

I can not judge Crane and co for being persecutors one day and defense lawyers the next day. Their only interest is in their clients and to get their job done.

Peace, Aki, Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aki,</p>
<p>This is all about professional services&#8230;and we can nail these fellows all we want but they have the right to defend whosoever they chose. Of course we can question their moral-ethical standards but in this business, things work differently.</p>
<p>I can not judge Crane and co for being persecutors one day and defense lawyers the next day. Their only interest is in their clients and to get their job done.</p>
<p>Peace, Aki, Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
