<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can the Prosecution Also Present New Witnesses &#8212; as Well as New Documents to Impeach Mr. Taylor &#8212; Even Though It Has Finished Presenting Its Case-In-Chief?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/12/11/can-the-prosecution-also-present-new-witnesses-as-well-as-new-documents-to-impeach-mr-taylor-even-though-it-has-finished-presenting-its-case-in-chief/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/12/11/can-the-prosecution-also-present-new-witnesses-as-well-as-new-documents-to-impeach-mr-taylor-even-though-it-has-finished-presenting-its-case-in-chief/</link>
	<description>International Criminal Justice in the Making</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:22:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bnker</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/12/11/can-the-prosecution-also-present-new-witnesses-as-well-as-new-documents-to-impeach-mr-taylor-even-though-it-has-finished-presenting-its-case-in-chief/#comment-16202</link>
		<dc:creator>bnker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4601#comment-16202</guid>
		<description>Jose,

Frankly, they don&#039;t make much, maybe below minimum wage. He might work about 40 hours a week, but honestly, these guys will not get millions from that prison work...but if they are depending on his prison work to get rich.....&quot;ain&#039;t happening&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jose,</p>
<p>Frankly, they don&#8217;t make much, maybe below minimum wage. He might work about 40 hours a week, but honestly, these guys will not get millions from that prison work&#8230;but if they are depending on his prison work to get rich&#8230;..&#8221;ain&#8217;t happening&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/12/11/can-the-prosecution-also-present-new-witnesses-as-well-as-new-documents-to-impeach-mr-taylor-even-though-it-has-finished-presenting-its-case-in-chief/#comment-16151</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4601#comment-16151</guid>
		<description>Bnker,

I will consider Bartu Taylor Jr. to be who he says he is, until otherwise. By the way, My message has gone to not only him, but all who may have access to Chucky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bnker,</p>
<p>I will consider Bartu Taylor Jr. to be who he says he is, until otherwise. By the way, My message has gone to not only him, but all who may have access to Chucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/12/11/can-the-prosecution-also-present-new-witnesses-as-well-as-new-documents-to-impeach-mr-taylor-even-though-it-has-finished-presenting-its-case-in-chief/#comment-16150</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4601#comment-16150</guid>
		<description>Bnker,

How much money does a prisoner gets pay? How many hours does a prison allow to work? How much is Chucky garnished wage will be? How long will the garnished wage amounts to millions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bnker,</p>
<p>How much money does a prisoner gets pay? How many hours does a prison allow to work? How much is Chucky garnished wage will be? How long will the garnished wage amounts to millions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noko5</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/12/11/can-the-prosecution-also-present-new-witnesses-as-well-as-new-documents-to-impeach-mr-taylor-even-though-it-has-finished-presenting-its-case-in-chief/#comment-16102</link>
		<dc:creator>noko5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4601#comment-16102</guid>
		<description>Fallah,
Please do not say any wrong stuff to anyone here cause it will not make it through...woooo!!!!!!!hahaha.. I know you are pis. But that &#039;s ok we&#039;ll take care of you next time....PRESIDENT TAYLOR OH&gt;&gt;YEA!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fallah,<br />
Please do not say any wrong stuff to anyone here cause it will not make it through&#8230;woooo!!!!!!!hahaha.. I know you are pis. But that &#8216;s ok we&#8217;ll take care of you next time&#8230;.PRESIDENT TAYLOR OH&gt;&gt;YEA!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noko5</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/12/11/can-the-prosecution-also-present-new-witnesses-as-well-as-new-documents-to-impeach-mr-taylor-even-though-it-has-finished-presenting-its-case-in-chief/#comment-16098</link>
		<dc:creator>noko5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4601#comment-16098</guid>
		<description>Sansee,
I don&#039;t know where you got these informations you posted about mr. Taylor and the then legislature, sad to say brother, I think this posting was wholly and solly intended to categoricly mislead the public.. there are brothers and sisters who were not in liberia and are also accessing the informations we are putting here.  Please sir, say the true. We don&#039;t mind if it is against Mr. Taylor... begging you brother..ok</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sansee,<br />
I don&#8217;t know where you got these informations you posted about mr. Taylor and the then legislature, sad to say brother, I think this posting was wholly and solly intended to categoricly mislead the public.. there are brothers and sisters who were not in liberia and are also accessing the informations we are putting here.  Please sir, say the true. We don&#8217;t mind if it is against Mr. Taylor&#8230; begging you brother..ok</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noko5</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/12/11/can-the-prosecution-also-present-new-witnesses-as-well-as-new-documents-to-impeach-mr-taylor-even-though-it-has-finished-presenting-its-case-in-chief/#comment-16095</link>
		<dc:creator>noko5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4601#comment-16095</guid>
		<description>Hey Tracey,
 Is this  new evidence introduction open ended? Would there be limitations in respect to quantity and time? Or is there any limitation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tracey,<br />
 Is this  new evidence introduction open ended? Would there be limitations in respect to quantity and time? Or is there any limitation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noko4</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/12/11/can-the-prosecution-also-present-new-witnesses-as-well-as-new-documents-to-impeach-mr-taylor-even-though-it-has-finished-presenting-its-case-in-chief/#comment-15966</link>
		<dc:creator>Noko4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4601#comment-15966</guid>
		<description>King Gray,
That&#039;s the game plan......mudding the water and make us to believe Liberia is Sierra Leone. Pure waste of time to say the least. But they have met their match..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>King Gray,<br />
That&#8217;s the game plan&#8230;&#8230;mudding the water and make us to believe Liberia is Sierra Leone. Pure waste of time to say the least. But they have met their match..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bnker</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/12/11/can-the-prosecution-also-present-new-witnesses-as-well-as-new-documents-to-impeach-mr-taylor-even-though-it-has-finished-presenting-its-case-in-chief/#comment-15958</link>
		<dc:creator>bnker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4601#comment-15958</guid>
		<description>Jose,
FYI...Chuckie is representing himself and is not expected to take the stand. So I guess you can rest assured, he will not &quot;talk anyting bah agaist de papey&quot;. Jose, you said that you&#039;ve lived in the States before right, there are criminal case (as the torture trial of Chuckie) and civil, which seeks punitive damages and monetary compensation. The article explains that it is unclear if Chuckie has money (I doubt he does), but this is what will happen. He will have prison jobs and most of his earnings there will be garnished for the victims. 

Hope that helped!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jose,<br />
FYI&#8230;Chuckie is representing himself and is not expected to take the stand. So I guess you can rest assured, he will not &#8220;talk anyting bah agaist de papey&#8221;. Jose, you said that you&#8217;ve lived in the States before right, there are criminal case (as the torture trial of Chuckie) and civil, which seeks punitive damages and monetary compensation. The article explains that it is unclear if Chuckie has money (I doubt he does), but this is what will happen. He will have prison jobs and most of his earnings there will be garnished for the victims. </p>
<p>Hope that helped!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracey Gurd</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/12/11/can-the-prosecution-also-present-new-witnesses-as-well-as-new-documents-to-impeach-mr-taylor-even-though-it-has-finished-presenting-its-case-in-chief/#comment-15953</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracey Gurd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4601#comment-15953</guid>
		<description>Eagle-Eye (Returns) -- welcome back.  We missed your comments!  Glad you have returned to us. 
Best,
Tracey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eagle-Eye (Returns) &#8212; welcome back.  We missed your comments!  Glad you have returned to us.<br />
Best,<br />
Tracey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eagle-eye(Returns)</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/12/11/can-the-prosecution-also-present-new-witnesses-as-well-as-new-documents-to-impeach-mr-taylor-even-though-it-has-finished-presenting-its-case-in-chief/#comment-15952</link>
		<dc:creator>Eagle-eye(Returns)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4601#comment-15952</guid>
		<description>Merry X-mas to all and sorry I have been away for while but never mind that. Jose, I am sorry you think my logic is twisted and the whole world agree with you that the prosecution has failed, if that is the case why are so hot under the colar.

You see you should be happy that Taylor, whom you have advocated so much will walk free but you see my friend even you know that the prosecution could not have determine what th defence will ask taylor during cross-examination, so if they ask for time then so what. There nothing in law that states you can&#039;t. I think more and more eviden ce will come and Taylor will be expose. Whether he is found guilty or not is for the judges to decide.

So relax and enjoy your season because things are going to get a little bit more interesting in the new year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merry X-mas to all and sorry I have been away for while but never mind that. Jose, I am sorry you think my logic is twisted and the whole world agree with you that the prosecution has failed, if that is the case why are so hot under the colar.</p>
<p>You see you should be happy that Taylor, whom you have advocated so much will walk free but you see my friend even you know that the prosecution could not have determine what th defence will ask taylor during cross-examination, so if they ask for time then so what. There nothing in law that states you can&#8217;t. I think more and more eviden ce will come and Taylor will be expose. Whether he is found guilty or not is for the judges to decide.</p>
<p>So relax and enjoy your season because things are going to get a little bit more interesting in the new year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

