<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: As Cross-Examination Of Charles Taylor Starts, Prosecution Tells Taylor He Has A Reason To Lie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/11/10/as-cross-examination-of-charles-taylor-starts-prosecution-tells-taylor-he-has-a-reason-to-lie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/11/10/as-cross-examination-of-charles-taylor-starts-prosecution-tells-taylor-he-has-a-reason-to-lie/</link>
	<description>International Criminal Justice in the Making</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:22:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MsTeage</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/11/10/as-cross-examination-of-charles-taylor-starts-prosecution-tells-taylor-he-has-a-reason-to-lie/#comment-12603</link>
		<dc:creator>MsTeage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4521#comment-12603</guid>
		<description>Rodriguez, 
I&#039;m not even going to go there with you. This is childish and our back and forth conversation is irrelevant to this website. I know for a fact that I was on this site way before you and many people, reading mostly and posting a couple of times. I need to prove NOTHING to you

It ends here.
-cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rodriguez,<br />
I&#8217;m not even going to go there with you. This is childish and our back and forth conversation is irrelevant to this website. I know for a fact that I was on this site way before you and many people, reading mostly and posting a couple of times. I need to prove NOTHING to you</p>
<p>It ends here.<br />
-cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/11/10/as-cross-examination-of-charles-taylor-starts-prosecution-tells-taylor-he-has-a-reason-to-lie/#comment-12513</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4521#comment-12513</guid>
		<description>Teage,
where and when have I told you that your opinions are not &quot;valid&quot;? Please give me my exact quotes. Besides, Teage, you are the one following me, because I stated writing before you on this site in my real name, Jose Rodriguez. I know you claimed to be one of the first two posters to write on this site, but in different name. Well, prove it. Anybody can claim to be those names of the first two poster. Anyways, I have to watch the trial now and I don&#039;t want to dwell on triviality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teage,<br />
where and when have I told you that your opinions are not &#8220;valid&#8221;? Please give me my exact quotes. Besides, Teage, you are the one following me, because I stated writing before you on this site in my real name, Jose Rodriguez. I know you claimed to be one of the first two posters to write on this site, but in different name. Well, prove it. Anybody can claim to be those names of the first two poster. Anyways, I have to watch the trial now and I don&#8217;t want to dwell on triviality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MsTeage</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/11/10/as-cross-examination-of-charles-taylor-starts-prosecution-tells-taylor-he-has-a-reason-to-lie/#comment-12311</link>
		<dc:creator>MsTeage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4521#comment-12311</guid>
		<description>Rodriguez, 

Why do you contiunously follow my comment and reply about things that re not even relevant. So what if I made a comment to Chris you have to pay that. And you talk about All my Sierra Leonean friends, as if there are like 20 of them....how many of them do you know, how many of them do you know have visited this site and felt comfortable leaving their comments...exactly what I thought. 

People bowing out that is fine. I&#039;m not here to yield or bow out. I&#039;m here to express my opinion. And majority of the people on this site or Charles Taylor supporters, and you guys constantly try to antagonize people if they don&#039;t share the same sentiments of Taylor. You all constantly tell me to &quot;stick to the subject&quot;...yet you constantly stray away from the Topic when i say something that is not in line with support for Taylor. You all looked at the evidence and arrived at a conclusion when others look at the exact same evidence, and arrive at a different conclusion you all focus your energy and attention trying to &quot;change their minds&quot; or make them feel not welcome. This is not a site in favor of Taylor, this is a site for people, (whether they agree or not with Taylor) to be updated with the trail, and to express their opinions. So when you all direct your attention on telling someone how their opinions are not &quot;valid&quot;, because YOU think Taylor is not guilty, people tend to feel uncomfortable and they leave the site. It is only people who could care less what yall think about Taylor innocence that stick around. So you see Rodriguez, it&#039;s not that people don&#039;t find enough evidence but it&#039;s just you guys go out of your way to make a person feel welcome. I saw a new post who supported Taylor. And Noko4 or Noko5 said, you are welcome to this site. 
and you say &quot;this website is for the general public use&quot;....LOL. When Sam asked me a question about why I&#039;m not around I answered him and Tracey said &quot;congrats on  your job&quot; you said you could care less about my job. I was simply answering Sams question, and that was not the first time you wrote &quot;I could care less&quot;. If you could care less and this is for the general public to express themselves, than why do you keep following my comments and making remarks that are irrelevant to this trail. Why not follow Noko5, or Noko4 or Andrew. I&#039;ll tell you why because they share the same sentiments about Taylor and their comments you agree with you like you enjoy reading.
There are few comments directed towards me that has not been allowed because it was not quite appropriate. How many of my comments have not been appropriate?
As you tell me Rodriguez and as I am telling you now. &quot;I can care-less&quot; about whether or not you think the evidence don&#039;t support the charges. That is your opinion that is fine. 

My opinion is I have followed the trail since Taylor defense was given the chance to prepare, ever since when Taylor was not in the court room at the beginning, I&#039;ve read the evidence and I say GUILTY. So as you said Rodriguez and I hope we are not back at this again. This is a public site where people are free to express their opinions. My opinion is that CT is GUILTY, yes it&#039;s different from yours yes YOU, not ME think he is NOT GUILTY. So if you believe what you wrote that this is a public site and people are free to express their opinions, agree to disagree, respect my opinion as i do yours, quit writing what you &quot;care-less&quot; about after I&#039;ve posted and let&#039;s show people that this is indeed a public site and people are free to express themselves without others telling them that their opinions are not valid because it is not the same as (others). Different people are following this trail some are confused, so say Guilty some say innocent, either way. Every person has a right to their opinion. 
Either way whether my opinions are respected or not. I&#039;m here to the end, and I will keep expressing my opinions. 
With that said. I rest my case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rodriguez, </p>
<p>Why do you contiunously follow my comment and reply about things that re not even relevant. So what if I made a comment to Chris you have to pay that. And you talk about All my Sierra Leonean friends, as if there are like 20 of them&#8230;.how many of them do you know, how many of them do you know have visited this site and felt comfortable leaving their comments&#8230;exactly what I thought. </p>
<p>People bowing out that is fine. I&#8217;m not here to yield or bow out. I&#8217;m here to express my opinion. And majority of the people on this site or Charles Taylor supporters, and you guys constantly try to antagonize people if they don&#8217;t share the same sentiments of Taylor. You all constantly tell me to &#8220;stick to the subject&#8221;&#8230;yet you constantly stray away from the Topic when i say something that is not in line with support for Taylor. You all looked at the evidence and arrived at a conclusion when others look at the exact same evidence, and arrive at a different conclusion you all focus your energy and attention trying to &#8220;change their minds&#8221; or make them feel not welcome. This is not a site in favor of Taylor, this is a site for people, (whether they agree or not with Taylor) to be updated with the trail, and to express their opinions. So when you all direct your attention on telling someone how their opinions are not &#8220;valid&#8221;, because YOU think Taylor is not guilty, people tend to feel uncomfortable and they leave the site. It is only people who could care less what yall think about Taylor innocence that stick around. So you see Rodriguez, it&#8217;s not that people don&#8217;t find enough evidence but it&#8217;s just you guys go out of your way to make a person feel welcome. I saw a new post who supported Taylor. And Noko4 or Noko5 said, you are welcome to this site.<br />
and you say &#8220;this website is for the general public use&#8221;&#8230;.LOL. When Sam asked me a question about why I&#8217;m not around I answered him and Tracey said &#8220;congrats on  your job&#8221; you said you could care less about my job. I was simply answering Sams question, and that was not the first time you wrote &#8220;I could care less&#8221;. If you could care less and this is for the general public to express themselves, than why do you keep following my comments and making remarks that are irrelevant to this trail. Why not follow Noko5, or Noko4 or Andrew. I&#8217;ll tell you why because they share the same sentiments about Taylor and their comments you agree with you like you enjoy reading.<br />
There are few comments directed towards me that has not been allowed because it was not quite appropriate. How many of my comments have not been appropriate?<br />
As you tell me Rodriguez and as I am telling you now. &#8220;I can care-less&#8221; about whether or not you think the evidence don&#8217;t support the charges. That is your opinion that is fine. </p>
<p>My opinion is I have followed the trail since Taylor defense was given the chance to prepare, ever since when Taylor was not in the court room at the beginning, I&#8217;ve read the evidence and I say GUILTY. So as you said Rodriguez and I hope we are not back at this again. This is a public site where people are free to express their opinions. My opinion is that CT is GUILTY, yes it&#8217;s different from yours yes YOU, not ME think he is NOT GUILTY. So if you believe what you wrote that this is a public site and people are free to express their opinions, agree to disagree, respect my opinion as i do yours, quit writing what you &#8220;care-less&#8221; about after I&#8217;ve posted and let&#8217;s show people that this is indeed a public site and people are free to express themselves without others telling them that their opinions are not valid because it is not the same as (others). Different people are following this trail some are confused, so say Guilty some say innocent, either way. Every person has a right to their opinion.<br />
Either way whether my opinions are respected or not. I&#8217;m here to the end, and I will keep expressing my opinions.<br />
With that said. I rest my case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/11/10/as-cross-examination-of-charles-taylor-starts-prosecution-tells-taylor-he-has-a-reason-to-lie/#comment-12161</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4521#comment-12161</guid>
		<description>Teage, people bowing out is because of NO PROOF. Is that plain and simple. Speaking about intimidation, it is the side you are supporting that continues to intimidate and not the other way around. For example: people are on UN travel ban and asset freeze list for knowing this innocent man. Thereby scarying and intimidating potential witnesses of President Taylor, who may want to testify on his behalf. To me, is a form of intimidation. Besides, you guys call us all sorts of names such as, rebel, killers, Taylor supporters, beneficiary of loots, cannibals, uneducated, unpatriotic, unintelligent, uncivilized, indiciplined, murderer, looters, lacking common sense, human flesh eater and etc. However, you don&#039;t find these name calling intimidatory, but when we ask a simple question such as, where is the evidence or show us the evidence, you consider it as intimidation?

Teage, we had had some Sierra Leonean posting comments before. So if Chris is a Sierra Leonean, it is not the first of it&#039;s kind. The only think is his views is in the minority.
Finally Teage, do you want us to believe that most of your Sierra Leonean friends will not like this site because of &quot;CT die-hard fans.&quot; Well, these are your friends, so you know them better. But, I can tell them that this is not a &quot;CT&quot; website. This website is provided for the general public use. Therefore, they are strongly encourage to come and view or express their opinion here without fear of intimidation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teage, people bowing out is because of NO PROOF. Is that plain and simple. Speaking about intimidation, it is the side you are supporting that continues to intimidate and not the other way around. For example: people are on UN travel ban and asset freeze list for knowing this innocent man. Thereby scarying and intimidating potential witnesses of President Taylor, who may want to testify on his behalf. To me, is a form of intimidation. Besides, you guys call us all sorts of names such as, rebel, killers, Taylor supporters, beneficiary of loots, cannibals, uneducated, unpatriotic, unintelligent, uncivilized, indiciplined, murderer, looters, lacking common sense, human flesh eater and etc. However, you don&#8217;t find these name calling intimidatory, but when we ask a simple question such as, where is the evidence or show us the evidence, you consider it as intimidation?</p>
<p>Teage, we had had some Sierra Leonean posting comments before. So if Chris is a Sierra Leonean, it is not the first of it&#8217;s kind. The only think is his views is in the minority.<br />
Finally Teage, do you want us to believe that most of your Sierra Leonean friends will not like this site because of &#8220;CT die-hard fans.&#8221; Well, these are your friends, so you know them better. But, I can tell them that this is not a &#8220;CT&#8221; website. This website is provided for the general public use. Therefore, they are strongly encourage to come and view or express their opinion here without fear of intimidation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/11/10/as-cross-examination-of-charles-taylor-starts-prosecution-tells-taylor-he-has-a-reason-to-lie/#comment-12153</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4521#comment-12153</guid>
		<description>Teage, show us the evidence. Did I hear you say, Taylor is a smart man? Hummmmmm. Interesting. Do you really know this man that you are calling coward? This man is challenging the entire world and you still think he&#039;s a coward? Teage, you falsely claimed that you know this man, but you really don&#039;t know him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teage, show us the evidence. Did I hear you say, Taylor is a smart man? Hummmmmm. Interesting. Do you really know this man that you are calling coward? This man is challenging the entire world and you still think he&#8217;s a coward? Teage, you falsely claimed that you know this man, but you really don&#8217;t know him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MsTeage</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/11/10/as-cross-examination-of-charles-taylor-starts-prosecution-tells-taylor-he-has-a-reason-to-lie/#comment-12106</link>
		<dc:creator>MsTeage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 01:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4521#comment-12106</guid>
		<description>LOL.....my friend...Don&#039;t bow out just yet...it&#039;s frustrating and it&#039;s annoying but a murderer like Taylor is not going to walk that easily......so keep following along and let&#039;s just watch and see Taylor pay for what he did in Sierra Leone. 
To Chris, 
It&#039;s good to have a Sierra Leonean on the blog, a lot of my SL friends will not like the site because CT die-hard fans wants everybody to be intimidated to share their non-Taylor sentiments, so it&#039;s good to have you on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL&#8230;..my friend&#8230;Don&#8217;t bow out just yet&#8230;it&#8217;s frustrating and it&#8217;s annoying but a murderer like Taylor is not going to walk that easily&#8230;&#8230;so keep following along and let&#8217;s just watch and see Taylor pay for what he did in Sierra Leone.<br />
To Chris,<br />
It&#8217;s good to have a Sierra Leonean on the blog, a lot of my SL friends will not like the site because CT die-hard fans wants everybody to be intimidated to share their non-Taylor sentiments, so it&#8217;s good to have you on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MsTeage</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/11/10/as-cross-examination-of-charles-taylor-starts-prosecution-tells-taylor-he-has-a-reason-to-lie/#comment-12105</link>
		<dc:creator>MsTeage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 01:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4521#comment-12105</guid>
		<description>It will never happen. Taylor is a smart man. I will admit that but he is not smart enought to get away with murders when there are so much evidence against him. Taylor and his Jr. boy certainly will never have the freedom to take another life, whether in Sierra Leone or Liberia. A coward like Taylor belongs in jail. And I admire Ms. Hollis, her hard work and I look forward to her hard work and efforts paying off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will never happen. Taylor is a smart man. I will admit that but he is not smart enought to get away with murders when there are so much evidence against him. Taylor and his Jr. boy certainly will never have the freedom to take another life, whether in Sierra Leone or Liberia. A coward like Taylor belongs in jail. And I admire Ms. Hollis, her hard work and I look forward to her hard work and efforts paying off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/11/10/as-cross-examination-of-charles-taylor-starts-prosecution-tells-taylor-he-has-a-reason-to-lie/#comment-12008</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4521#comment-12008</guid>
		<description>Tracey,
Please disregard my post and I apologize you are right. I did find information that said, &quot;Mr. Taylor is expected to take the stand in his own defense. Under the Special Court’s Rules, he will be the first witness to testify in the Defense case.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tracey,<br />
Please disregard my post and I apologize you are right. I did find information that said, &#8220;Mr. Taylor is expected to take the stand in his own defense. Under the Special Court’s Rules, he will be the first witness to testify in the Defense case.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j fallah menjor</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/11/10/as-cross-examination-of-charles-taylor-starts-prosecution-tells-taylor-he-has-a-reason-to-lie/#comment-11963</link>
		<dc:creator>j fallah menjor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4521#comment-11963</guid>
		<description>Harris, I know facts hurt! You cannot stop me from blessing taylor for all the developments and education you benefited from  and have our Liberian Brothers and Sisters reaping today! I also agree that this site is supposed to be for intellectuals!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harris, I know facts hurt! You cannot stop me from blessing taylor for all the developments and education you benefited from  and have our Liberian Brothers and Sisters reaping today! I also agree that this site is supposed to be for intellectuals!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j fallah menjor</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/2009/11/10/as-cross-examination-of-charles-taylor-starts-prosecution-tells-taylor-he-has-a-reason-to-lie/#comment-11962</link>
		<dc:creator>j fallah menjor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestaylortrial.org/?p=4521#comment-11962</guid>
		<description>Yes Sam, Don&#039;t you remembered  the sugarcane juice your grandpa sent to fallah menjor last week? I mean the cannabis that child soldiers were fed with during Gankay&#039; rule!I don&#039;t think you want to use direct insults since you seem out of vocabulary!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Sam, Don&#8217;t you remembered  the sugarcane juice your grandpa sent to fallah menjor last week? I mean the cannabis that child soldiers were fed with during Gankay&#8217; rule!I don&#8217;t think you want to use direct insults since you seem out of vocabulary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

