Comments on: Trial Chamber Holds Status Conference in Taylor Trial

By: Lazo

Lazo — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:33:26 +0000

Mr. Taylor has siad many that may served as evidences to be acquitted, only Mr. Taylor personal enimies want him to be responsible for crimes committed in salon. The fact will be idebtified when the case comes to the concluding point.

By: Kpakoja

Kpakoja — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:40:17 +0000

The reason why Taylor pleaded not guilty because he is of the conviction that he did not commit these crimes in Sierra Leone. I see no reason why he should not be acquitted of he pose a strong defense. The prosecution said they hard strong evidences that Taylor committed these crimes he’s accused of in Salon, we did not see that strong evidence from any of their witnesses. Taylor’s lawyers are also stating that they have a strong defense to countered the prosecution, we await to see. At the end of the day, justice must previal and all should be prepared to abide by it.

By: Noko4

Noko4 — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:01:11 +0000

Harry,
How many WITNESSES did the prosecutor had on her list??? Was her listing of over a hundre persons a “CRFAFT MANIPULATION”??? I think NOT.

I pray and hope he puts up a good fight, but from ALL indications, the outcome has already been determined…..GUILTY!!.

Good luck Mr. Taylor.

By: Helen

Helen — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:41:34 +0000

Are you panicking already? Isn’t it the right of an accused to present all possible evidence to ensure an acquital? Why didn’t you complain when the Prosecution took 12 months and presented all their witnesses in such a convoluted manner?

Do you people want justice or is this suposed to be a lynching mob for this man? Really now, he deserves to have his say and explain things from his point of view. Do not forget there are always two sides of a story. We have heard one side- the prosecution so lets hear the other side and then we can start drawing conclusions.

By: Aki

Aki — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:39:27 +0000

Harry,

Why are you afraid not that it is Taylor’s turn to produce evidence? You want him to be found guilty eventhough you know the Prosecutions case against him was weak.

By: Ken Barmor

Ken Barmor — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:02:31 +0000

Mr. Mason, you have already proclaim guilty before hearing the other side of the case. If Mr. Taylor is acquitted, that means that the prosecutors could not justify their charges to the judges and nothing else.

By: Harry Mason

Harry Mason — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:13:57 +0000

Charles G. Taylor is an architect of conspiracy and terrorism. His strategic move to have 256 witnesses testify on his behalf is intended to buy more time at his own advantage. A crafty manipulator, Mr. Taylor will imagine and employ the best ideas at his disposal to garner support for his eventual acquittal, which will be a disaster to humanity.

By: Joseph Sylvah

Joseph Sylvah — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:13:29 +0000

It will be grate to see Taylor as witness for himself